Monday 8 July 2013

Part 6: How can we use depth cues to depict personal space, action space and vista?



In making a picture on paper, or looking at a picture, only the first five of these cues, together with perspective convergence are available to us. The depth information we get from binocular disparity, accommodation, convergence and motion cannot be used in 2D pictures. 

I have chosen to try to illustrate some of the concepts discussed here, by using my own drawings. This is not because the drawings are good, but because I know there are no copyright issues!

Occlusion

This is a very strong cue for depth, and it’s equally effective in personal space right through to vista. It will generally override information about relative size, for example. Occlusion was used even in the 20,000 year old cave paintings of Chauvet, for example.

In a city, things in personal space will often occlude a large part of the visual field, but sometimes only fleetingly. Think of a person walking past, close to where you are drawing – for a fraction of a second a part of your visual field might be occupied only by a head and shoulders, say, occluding what is further away. Our first response is often to ignore this kind of interruption, and to make no marks about it in our drawing. But maybe some drawn reference to this fleeting occlusion would increase the sense of movement and depth in your drawing? 

A busy day at the National Gallery

Drawing on the bus
Sometimes it’s interesting to choose a drawing view in which there is deliberate occlusion by objects near you – the cafĂ© table drawing is an example, or drawing in the theatre or on a bus. Even if you choose to draw where there is nothing in personal space, things will sometimes intrude and it’s interesting to include them somehow in your drawing.


Unless you're sitting at a table or very close to other people,  or street furniture, etc, there's often nothing obvious in our personal space. Unless you look down! The ground at our feet is in our personal space. Perhaps there are ways of incorporating this in our drawings. (If you do this you may find yourself needing to add paper to your drawing to include both the ground and the view at eye level. This is what I did in the drawing of St Paul's in an earlier posting)

 

Relative size

This too is a cue which extends over all 3 spaces, although it is not as strong a cue as occlusion – partly because there may be some uncertainty about the actual size of objects. The relative size of things is much more powerful a cue when they are close to you.


Skaters at Somerset House


You can exploit relative size to give dramatic effect to your drawing. You will notice this if you draw a street (action space) with figures, and include a figure that comes close to, or within your personal space. It’s almost impossible to draw the close figure large enough. When figures are very close to us, we can’t see the whole figure without changing our viewpoint. 

This effect increases dramatically as things enter personal space. Including  just a section of a large figure in a drawing implies closeness.  Just a hand of someone walking past at a distance of half a metre may appear as big as a whole crowd 20 meters away.
Asakusa


Again,  it’s sometimes  a good idea to add paper to increase the size of your drawing if you find that things close by in personal space, are taking up more of your drawing than you expected.

Relative density

This cue works well over short to medium distances. Representing paving stones, or cobbles in a street for example. 
Relative density of the gridded fence increases with distance

Does it work in personal space? Yes, but less strongly, I think – think of a chequered tablecloth in front of you for example. 

Over long distances the difference in density may be too small to perceive. For this reason, it’s often impossible to draw patterns on things in vista space to indicate relative density. Changes in density on objects in personal space, for example in a table top texture, are often too slight to be useful in a drawing.

Height in the visual field

This cue works well over action space and vista, and has been used in traditional art in many Asian cultures to depict space (See, for example Chines scroll paintings).
window view, Venice
 
 Some art cultures have effectively tipped the ground plane up until it is vertical, parallel with the picture plane, and used relative height as the main indicator of distance. (Much Mughal art from India used this device). Are there creative ways you can incorporate some of this approach in your own work?

In personal space, where things are so close to you, height in the visual field can be very confused, and a poor indicator of spatial distance.

Aerial perspective

Strictly speaking this  only works in drawings that include vista, and it works most effectively using colour. Distant views become bluer, less distinct and lower contrast as they recede.

from the train to Matsumoto


It is possible to depict this without colour as long as the medium being used allows for tone – things getting lighter and less distinct as distance gets bigger.

Aerial perspective in tone, Bankside, London


It’s also possible to use the aerial perspective depth cue in views where it can’t actually be seen. You could for example, choose to draw everything that’s close to you in a darker tone than things further away, even though they are all within 30 metres or so. As if aerial perspective was visible over such a short distance.

In  a restaurant kitchen
You could similarly choose to use a range of different colours to draw a number of different bands of depth.

In a restaurant kitchen


So, that's the end of the briefing notes, for now, at least. In a few hours I'm off to Barcelona to enjoy meeting and drawing with urban sketchers from all over the world. I'm sure I'll learn a lot, and have a lot of fun!
 
Finally, I'd like to repeat that I'm not suggesting that the ideas in this blog are 'the right way' to draw. They may not even be 'a good way' to draw for you. The purpose of the blog is simply to add some more thoughts and ideas  to the exploration I hope will happen in the workshops in Barcelona. Now, let's draw!

Part 5: more depth cues...




 In addition to the depth cues I talked about in the previous post, all of which can be exploited in pictures, there are 4 cues which are very powerful, particularly in judging the distance of things close by, in personal space. 

Unfortunately these cues arise only in the presence of motion or stereoscopic vision, and can't be reprodiuced in drawings! They're mentioned here for interest only.


1. binocular disparities

 – The left and right eyes see a slightly different angle of an object. If an object is far away, the disparity of that image falling on both retinas will be small, and the effect is not noticeable. If the object is near, in personal space, the disparity will be large. Hold a finger up at arm’s length and close each eye alternately – notice how you have a different field of view in each eye.

2. motion parallax 

- When an observer moves, the apparent relative motion of several stationary objects against a background gives hints about their relative distance. This is very noticeable when watching the landscape from a moving train. 

3. convergence 

- When the two eye balls focus on the same object they are said to converge. This convergence stretches the muscles attached to the eyeball. The angle of convergence, and hence the muscle stretch,  is smaller when the eye is fixating on far away objects, and hence is not very effective at a distance of over 10 metres. It becomes most effective at very close range, particularly within personal space. 

4. accommodation

 - This is another muscular cue for depth perception. When we try to focus on far away objects, the muscles of the lens in the eye  stretch, making the lens  thinner, to change the focal length. The sensation of these muscles contracting and relaxing is used by the brain for interpreting distance/depth. Like other muscular cues accommodation is only effective close up, within personal space. 


Part 4: How we know one thing is nearer than another...



 If we’re thinking about the three bands of spatial depth in our environment, and how we might refer to them in drawing, it’s worth considering the ways in which we read depth in the real world, and in pictures the clues that tell us one thing is nearer than another.

 

The way humans make  judgments about spatial depth, about what is near and what is far, is complex and involves the interplay of a number of sources of information.  However,  research literature suggests that there are nine or ten important  cues that combine to indicate depth. Some of the cues are effective only at short range, and others only at long range.

Depth cues in the real world

1.  occlusion 

– if one object obscures part of another object, then it is closer to the viewer 



   

2. relative size 

– if two objects of the same physical size appear different in size then the smaller is further away. (This cue also gives information about the relative distance - if the smaller object is half the size of the larger then it is twice as far away)

3. relative density 

– a regular patterned surface (eg a tiled floor) will appear denser, the further away it is  Fine details on nearby objects can be seen clearly, whereas such details are not visible on faraway objects. On a long gravel road, the shape, size and colour of the gravel near the observer can be clearly seen. In the distance, the road's texture cannot be made out clearly. 


4. height in the visual field

 – if two objects are on the same ground plane, then the further object will appear to be higher in the visual field. 




5. aerial perspective 

– the further away an object is the less distinct it appears. Owing to light scattering by the atmosphere, objects that are a great distance away have lower contrast and colour saturation. Images seem blurry the farther they are away from a person's point of view. This is only usually noticeable in the distance, beyond the action space boundary.    


All five of the depth cues combine together in a scene like this


These five depth cues work in real life, and they can all be used to depict spatial depth in making pictures.

  • (Next part: 4 more depth cues, that are very strong in the real world, but can't be used in drawings...)