In most urban drawing (there are a few important exceptions
to this noted below) the focus is on action space, even if some vista is
visible. Urban sketching is often predominantly
about drawing action space. But does it have to be? If we are experiencing
three bands of space, might we try to reflect this in our drawings?
Vista space in the city
Sometimes in the city our view simply doesn’t include any vista
space. From my café table today, my view is bounded by the shops on the other
side of the street. That happens to be a little over 30 metres, I’m guessing, but
it feels like action space to me. I have no vista in that direction!
In cities we rarely have time to notice vista even when it
is visible. Except perhaps when we draw. When we draw in the city our visual
field may often include some vista that we have not paid attention to until we
start to draw – the buildings far down the street, or the hills glimpsed
between buildings.
One exception to the usual focus on action space in urban
drawings is the view of a city from
outside, or from far away, where all is vista.
The City of London drawn from Greenwich |
Another exception, is the city view from a high viewpoint. A
townscape drawn from the top of a high building is all vista – everything is
beyond action space!
St Giles church from the 12th floor of Centre Point |
Another approach might be to imagine yourself to be a zoom
lensed camera, making the distant view the core of your picture, with only
minimal elements of action space to provide framing. This kind of drawing might
also reverse the usual practice of drawing the foreground (action space) in
more detail than the hazier vista.
Personal space in the city
When we are drawing in cities, we often also ignore personal
space as a part of our visual experience. Very often we will even choose a drawing location
that ensures that there is nothing visible in our personal space (except perhaps
the ground and our own hands, which we ignore). We probably think of this as
choosing a view which has ‘nothing in the way’. And yet personal space is of such
psychological importance to us, particularly in city environments, that it
seems odd not to include it in our drawings.
Perhaps the most common way in which artists have included
personal space in urban drawings is the ‘café table’ picture, in which the lower
half of the picture may focus on plates and cups immediately in front of the
artist. We’ve all made these kinds of drawing I’m sure!
sketchbook page - piazza in Verona |
One reason we don’t we make more use of personal space in
urban drawing is that it is difficult! Objects in personal space occupy a relatively
large amount of the visual field, and will obscure things further away. The ‘café
table’ picture works because the personal space objects are raised up closer to
eye level, and can be included in a picture without changing eye level very
much.
Wapping foreshore - vista in the centre, additional sheets added laterally, including personal space at the right |
sheets added vertically |
The drawing at the right began with drawing the vista view of St Paul's and the sky, continuing down, adding sheets as necessary until I could draw the edge of the platform at my feet.
Another way of including objects in personal space, and in
action space, might be to abandon any idea of drawing the space as if it’s a
view from a single viewpoint, and instead, construct a picture from elements composed
on the picture plane. This is one of the ways in which Picasso and Braque
conveyed the world.
(Next post: the cues we use to read space...)
No comments:
Post a Comment